h4831sc - An Overview
h4831sc - An Overview
Blog Article
What's All people acquiring excellent precision with for 180gr tablets and 4831? Just on the lookout for a starting point so I don't waste a lot of factors. Thanks for the help!
In regards to bench relaxation matches, Hodgdon® rifle powders have posted far more wins than all other propellants put together. A great extruded powder, it flows properly and effortlessly by measures and provides match-grade precision when set to employ.
4gr of H4831sc and Federal 215 primers. I found this combo generates .5MOA teams with velocity about 3020fps from a 26" barrel. I exploit this exact powder in my 300wm shooting 180gr products, so It truly is good to get one powder for both.
Along with the 154 grain Hornady SP during the 280, H4831 gave me excellent teams and superior velocity, but Rottweil R905 includes a noticeably greater velocity and supplies marginally greater precision. With Swift a hundred and fifty grain Sciroccos in the 7mm RM, H4831SC gave exceptional precision and velocity, but RL22 was marginally superior. Therefore, in Every of such instances I went with Yet another powder, but I would definitely detest to divest myself on the H4831.
some cartridges are likely copper foul more than Some others however, irrespective of how clean the end is about the bore and call for cleaning in the copper fouling far more often.
Did you ever try out H4831sc in you 300wsm and 215 bergers. I have a 300wsm now. Capturing 180g with H4350 at 2940fps with standard chamber. Asking yourself what to expect with 215 bergers with H4331sc?
If there isn't a load data it can be due to the fact this powder is just not well suited for this cartridge. Normally a single won't find a person powder to suit all cartridges, as well as relatives of cartridges with the particular powder (4831SC) that you'll be asking about isn't going to work.
and you should spend money on some new load data books. powder composition and chemistry can does improve over the years. 4831 powder of a long h4831sc load data time in the past isn't really similar as exactly what is currently available. that's why someone serious about reloading safely may have essentially the most recent load data textbooks to seek advice from.
Presently utilizing IMR 4831 in a 300WSM, and find out the H4831sc is a well-liked option for this caliber and yields a bit more velocity. Apart from it being h4831 vs h4831sc shorter Slice, precisely what is the real difference in these two powders, and may I change to H4831sc?
Why would I mention this? What exactly is my issue? I'm unsure that there's a serious valid position in addition to what's well known with most hasn't been well-liked with me in the slightest degree in these situations. Do I just Have a very powder jinx or a little something? Just to explain to you how mad I actually am, tomorrow I'm array tests a mates new .
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and will be reviving an outdated thread. Please contemplate making a new thread.
Just after studying this post (and several Many others, but this one is the most data driven with numerous accredited shooters) I've stopped worrying about touching or being inside a magical distance in the lands, and started loading where I could optimize multiple aspects of a load. Just my .02, with any luck , you can find a little something to operate for ya.
Am i able to think that H4831 could be substituted for H4831sc ? I'm sure the physical variance but will it impact the burn off or velocity? I do think not but I'm not 100% absolutely sure.
IMR4831 and H4831SC are different. Wherever you could be confusing it h4831sc load data and thinking that it really is close is H4831 and H4831SC are really related. Individuals two are practically precisely the same besides H4831SC is made to more compact grains so it meters easier.